Geothermal Resources
Geothermal energy is heat that originates within the earth. It is thermal energy contained in the rock and fluid that fills the fractures and pores within the earth’s crust. Exploitable geothermal resources originate from transport of heat to the surface through several geological and hydrological processes. Geothermal resources commonly have three components:
- A heat source
- Relatively high-permeability reservoir rock
- Water to transfer the heat
Geothermal Processes
Many of the large-scale geological processes that have helped to form the earth’s surface features are powered by the flow of heat from inner regions of higher temperature to outer regions of lower temperature. Generation of new oceanic crust at spreading centers such as the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, motion of the great lithospheric plates, uplifting of mountain ranges, release of stored strain energy by earthquakes and eruption of volcanoes are all powered by the outward transport of internal heat. Using present technology applied under favorable circumstances, holes can be drilled to depths of about 10 km (6.2 mi), where temperatures range upward from about 150°C (300°F) in average areas to 600°C (1,100°F) in exceptional areas.
In general, the heat source for most of the high-temperature resources (greater than 150°C [300°F]) appears to be a molten or recently solidified intrusion, whereas many of the low-temperature (less than 100°C [212°F]) and moderate-temperature resources (between 100° and 150°C [212° and 300°F]) seem to result from deep circulation of meteoric water with heating due to the normal increase in temperature with depth. In most geothermal systems, fracture permeability controls water movement, but intergranular permeability is also important in some systems.
Water is, of course, the ideal heat transfer fluid because it has a high heat capacity and high heat of vaporization, and can therefore transport more heat per unit volume than any other common fluid. A free convective circulating system is naturally established with the heated water ascending in the center of the system along zones of permeability, spreading outward in the shallow subsurface or discharging to the surface. Cool water descends along the margins and recharges the system. Rapid convection produces nearly uniform temperatures over large volumes of the reservoir.
Geothermal Use in Utah
Utah is one of only seven states that generates utilityscale electricity from geothermal resources, contributing 527 gigawatt hours (GWh) to Utah’s electricity mix (about 1.5% of Utah’s total electric generation of 33,528 GWh in 2023). Geothermal is a base load renewable energy source that produces electricity at an annual average of nearly 80% of its installed capacity (capacity factor). This is many times higher than intermittent wind and solar production in Utah, which have capacity factors averaging about 20% and 30%, respectively.
The most promising geothermal resource potential is predominantly found in rural Utah communities, and investments will impact all sectors of the economy and provide a variety of employment opportunities.
- High-temperature steam and hot water (> 350°F), used for direct-steam and flash-steam power generation
- Moderate-temperature fluid (200° – 350°F), used for binary power generation and commercial space and process heating
- Low-temperature water (< 200°F), used for greenhouse heat, aquaculture and other light commercial uses; geoexchange systems utilize rock, soil, or groundwater at temperatures from 40°F to 100°F as a heat source in winter and a heat sink in summer for space conditioning in commercial and residential buildings
Power Plants
Roosevelt Hot Springs, Beaver County
Utah Power, a PacifiCorp company that merged with Scottish Power in 1999 and later was purchased by Mid-America Energy in 2005 has operated the single-flash, Blundell geothermal power station at the Roosevelt Hot Springs geothermal area near Milford in Beaver County since 1984.
Utah Power produces geothermal brine for the Blundell plant from wells that tap a geothermal resource in fractured, crystalline rock. The resource depths range generally between 640 and 1,830 m (2,100 and 6,000 ft). Resource temperatures in production wells usually exceed 271°C (520°F). Wellhead separators are used to “flash” the geothermal fluid into liquid and vapor phases. The vapor phase, or steam fraction, is collected from the production wells and directed into the power plant at temperatures between 177 and 204°C (350 and 400°F) with steam pressure approaching 7.66 kilograms per square centimeter (109 psi). The liquid phase, or geothermal brine, is diverted to a new, binary power unit, after which the spent fluid is channeled back into the reservoir through gravity-fed injection wells.
The plant produces 26 MWe gross (23 MWe net) from the single-flash unit, and an additional 11 MWe (rated capacity) from the binary power unit.
GeoSights: Roosevelt Hot Springs
Thermo Hot Springs, Beaver County
Raser Technologies began drilling geothermal exploratory wells at this known, but relatively unexplored, geothermal area about 16 km (10 mi) southwest of Minersville in Beaver County in November 2007. As of July 2009, Raser had completed 10 wells to depths approaching 2133 m (7000 ft). Bottom-hole temperatures measured in all wells are near 177°C (350°F).
This drilling program facilitated the development of the Hatch geothermal power plant. The plant consists of a rapid deployment design utilizing 50 binary power units, built by United Technologies, each with a capacity of 250 kWe, coupled to a water cooling system.
The net output of the Hatch plant is estimated between 10 and 11 MWe. Raser currently (2009) has a power purchase agreement with the City of Anaheim, California.
Cove Fort-Sulphurdale, Beaver County
At Sulphurdale, Beaver County in 1985, Mother Earth Industries, in cooperation with the city of Provo, installed a geothermal binary-cycle power system and a steam-turbine generator. In 1990, Provo and the Utah Municipal Power Agency dedicated the Bonnett geothermal power plant, which became the third geothermal power facility to go on-line at Sulphurdale to provide electricity for Provo. In 2003, Amp Resources acquired the Sulphurdale geothermal properties. Amp shut down the operation, with plans to reconstruct the facility and eventually build a 30 to 40 MWe binary power plant. In 2007, Enel North America acquired the project along with a number of other geothermal ventures in Nevada and California. Enel is currently (2009) drilling new wells, performing environmental assessments and geoscience investigations, in anticipation of constructing a new geothermal power generating facility.
Production wells primarily tap a shallow, vapor-dominated part of the geothermal system at depths between 335 and 366 m (1,100 and 1,200 ft). Deeper wells, however, reportedly will tap an underlying liquid-dominated part of the system.
Commercial Greenhouses
Newcastle, Iron County
Various research organizations and energy companies became interested in the Newcastle area of Iron County in the 1970s after farmers accidentally discovered a relatively shallow hydrothermal system while drilling irrigation wells. One well encountered a hot-water aquifer with a maximum temperature of 108°C (226°F) between depths of 75 and 94 m (245 and 310 ft). Subsequent studies by the UGS suggest a model of hot water rising along a mountain range-bounding fault and discharging into an aquifer in unconsolidated Quaternary sediments, forming a broad outflow plume. Temperatures within the outflow plume generally range between 82° and 104°C (180° and 220°F).
Two commercial greenhouses operators (Castlevalley Greenhouses and Milgro Newcastle, Inc.) use the geothermal fluid from shallow production wells (152 m [500 ft] deep) to heat four greenhouse complexes that produce high-quality flowers, vegetables, and ornamental plants year-round. All four of these complexes are clustered together above the geothermal outflow plume at Newcastle.
Milgro Newcastle, Inc. may be among the most successful companies using commercial applications of geothermal water for space heating in the United States. Milgro’s greenhouses are now the nation’s largest producer of chrysanthemums, and also one of the nation’s largest growers of flower bulbs, after having produced no bulbs prior to their Newcastle development. Milgro’s total greenhouse space at Newcastle is about 102,200 m2 (1.1 million ft2).
Castlevalley Greenhouses consists of nine arched, double plastic covered buildings. The main crop is tomatoes grown hydroponically. These are marketed by the owners throughout southern Utah. A few bedding plants are also grown. Castlevalley Greenhouses completed a 4600-m2 (49,500-ft2) addition in 2006 of geothermal-heated greenhouse space for a total of 8360 m2 (90,000 ft2).
Crystal (Bluffdale) Hot Springs, Salt Lake County
Crystal (Bluffdale) Hot Springs is located at the southern end of the Salt Lake Valley where Bluffdale Flower Growers (formerly Utah Roses) operates a geothermal-heated greenhouse complex. Bluffdale Flowers’ facility produces cut roses as its primary product, covering about 2.3 hectares (5.7 acres). In September 2009, the operators reported they were drilling two additional wells (one production and one injection) in order to expand operations by an additional 0.9 hectares (2.3 acres), that would bring the total area under cover to about 3.3 hectares (8.0 acres or 350,000 ft2) (Jack Kaleel, verbal communication, 9/15/09).
Surface spring temperatures are about 62°C (144°F). Subsurface temperatures of 88°C (190°F) have been reported in one of two 122-m (400-ft) deep production wells. The springs normally issue from valley alluvium into several ponds.
Utah Hot Springs, Box Elder and Weber Counties
Utah Hot Springs issue from several orifices in valley fill sediments at the western edge of the Pleasant View spur about 90 m (300 ft) west of U.S. 89 on the Box Elder-Weber County line. The area is within an urban-industrial setting adjacent to a utility corridor, highway, and Interstate 15. The springs presently flow under the railroad and across a gentle slope. The hot springs were on the Hensley/Salt Lake Cutoff emigrant trail used in the 1850s. At the turn of the century, a resort with a geothermally-heated pool was built. Special trains were run from Salt Lake City and Ogden to the resort while it was in use. The resort was torn down about 1970; however two cisterns remain that were used to collect the spring water.
The springs are currently used to heat a small commercial greenhouse run by the Allan Plant Company. The maximum water temperature reported is 63°C (145°F); although, temperatures reported in most studies ranged between 57°C and 58.5°C (135°F and 137°F). A total of 24 double-plastic-covered greenhouses are heated with the geothermal water year-round. These greenhouses are used to raise bedding plants (mainly geraniums) and poinsettias, which are sold wholesale to garden centers throughout northern Utah. Because of the high iron content in the water, special fittings are provided at intervals from the bottom of the heating pipes. These are flushed out with a hose three or four times a year.
Resorts and Recreation
Grantsville Warm Springs, Tooele County
Bonneville Seabase is a scuba diving facility developed at Grantsville Warm Springs located about 66 km (40 mi) west of Salt Lake City along Interstate Highway 80 in Tooele County. Seabase consists of several dive pools fed by warm springs and stocked with tropical marine fish. The facility is associated with Neptune Divers of Salt Lake City, a business devoted to scuba diving and related-product sales.
Blue Lake and Salt Spring, Bonneville Salt Flats, Tooele County
Low-temperature thermal waters are present in the western part of the Great Salt Lake Desert, as recorded in wells used for brine production and mineral extraction around the Bonneville Salt Flats, and as thermal springs at Blue Lake and Salt Spring. Blue Lake and Salt Spring, located in western Tooele County near the Utah-Nevada border, are small lakes fed by thermal springs. Although the temperatures of the spring vents located beneath Blue Lake are not known, the temperature of Blue Lake is fairly constant at about 29°C (84°F). The area, which includes a small parcel of private land, adjacent to a state wildlife preserve, both enclosed by a military reservation, is valuable for the recreational opportunities offered in the form of year-round scuba diving and as a wildlife habitat.
Belmont (Udy) Hot Springs, Box Elder County
At Belmont (Udy) Hot Springs in northeastern Box Elder County, about 50 hot springs and seeps issue along the Malad River at about 52°C (125°F). In addition to a golf course and camping facilities, the Camperworld resort has therapeutic hot tubs, a swimming pool, and a scuba diving pool. The dive pool is also used to heat four homes through black plastic pipes submerged in the pool.
Crystal (Madsen) Hot Springs, Box Elder County
Crystal (Madsen) Hot Springs Resort, near Honeyville along Interstate Highway 15 in Box Elder County, uses cold springs and hot springs at the same facility. The springs are situated along the northern extension of the Wasatch fault, which traverses the western side of the Wellsville Mountains. A cold spring (11°C [52°F]) is used to help fill a 1.1-million-liter (300,000 gallon) pool, while hot springs 60°C (140°F) fill therapeutic hot tubs, mineral pools, and also flow into the swimming pool. The warmer pools’ temperatures range from 29° to 44°C (85° to 112°F), while the large swimming pool is kept at about 21°C (70°F).
Midway, Wasatch County
Thermal springs in and around the community of Midway in Wasatch County issue from several widespread, coalescing travertine mounds covering an area of several square kilometers. Temperatures in the springs generally range from 35° to 46°C (95° to 115°F). Thermal water at Midway probably originates from deep circulation of meteoric water from recharge zones located to the north near Park City.
The Mountain Spa Resort, one of the oldest resorts in the state, uses thermal water for heating a swimming pool and for therapeutic baths. The thermal water flows at 43°C (110°F) and comes from 25 hot springs and two wells.
The Homestead Resort, a hotel and resort complex, uses thermal water in a therapeutic bath, and also offers guests scuba diving within a 35°C (95°F) thermal pool inside the Homestead Crater, a large travertine mound.
Monroe and Red Hill Hot Springs, Sevier County
The Monroe-Red Hill Hot Spring area is 16 km (10 mi) south of Richfield in Sevier County. The springs issue at about 77°C (170°F) near the surface trace of the Sevier fault adjacent to the Sevier Plateau. The area was the focus of U.S. Department of Energy-sponsored geothermal studies in the late 1970s.
The Mystic Hot Springs resort offers a geothermal-heated swimming pool, therapeutic baths, camping facilities, and tropical fish ponds. The geothermal water flows from travertine mounds behind the Mystic Hot Springs resort. Visitors can soak in bathtubs set in the travertine deposits, or in a travertine soaking pool.
Veyo Hot Springs, Washington County
Veyo Hot Spring is located southeast of the town of Veyo along the Santa Clara River. Here the river has incised 1 and 2 million-year-old basalt flows to form a steep-walled canyon.
The Veyo Pool resort offers swimming and therapeutic baths with spring flows channeled to the swimming pool at a temperature of about 32°C (89°F). The resort also operates the Crawdad Canyon Rock Climbing Park.
Pah Tempe (La Verkin/Dixie) Hot Springs, Washington County
Pah Tempe Hot Springs, also known as La Verkin or Dixie Hot Springs, are located along the Virgin River near where the river cuts through Timpoweap Canyon along the Hurricane Cliffs between the towns of Hurricane and La Verkin. The springs issue at about 42°C (108°F) from multiple vents in fractured limestone. Widespread basalt flows ranging in age from 2 million years to 1,000 years old lie in the vicinity of the springs, possibly relating to local heat sources for the thermal water.
At the Pah Tempe Mineral Hot Springs resort (temporarily closed) the thermal water is channeled into a swimming pool and therapeutic baths.
Aquaculture
Crystal (Bluffdale) Hot Springs, Salt Lake County
Hi-Tech Fisheries, a contract operator for Utah Correctional Industries, operates commercial tropical fish facilities near Crystal Pond, the largest of several ponds fed by Crystal Hot Springs. Discharge water from Bluffdale Flower Growers and the prison geothermal facility is used by Hi-Tech Fisheries. Crystal Springs Fisheries, another tropical fish facility, also uses the geothermal waters near the Utah State Prison. Approximately half a million cichlids (tropical fish from Africa) are raised annually.
For more information on these springs, see greenhouses and space heating.
Belmont (Udy) Hot Springs, Box Elder County
The former owners of the resort operated the Belmont Springs Hatchery, a commercial aquaculture facility raising lobsters and crayfish for distribution out of the local area. The current managers are considering raising bass and tropical fish.
For more information on these springs, see resorts.
Monroe and Red Hill Hot Springs, Sevier County
At Mystic Hot Springs resort six tropical fish ponds are keep at 24°C (75°F) year around, where Koi, Mollies, African cichlids, and fancy guppies are raised for the pet store market.
For more information on these springs, see resorts.
Midway, Wasatch County
Water drains from the pool inside the Homestead Crater into a fish pond adjacent to the Homestead Resort, where Koi fish are raised.
For more information on the Midway springs, see resorts.
Space Heating
Newcastle, Iron County
Geothermal water from one 107 m (350 ft) well is used to heat a LDS (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints) ward house in the town of Newcastle. The system reportedly uses a down-hole heat exchanger and closed-loop circulation.
For more information on the Newcastle area, see greenhouses.
Crystal (Bluffdale) Hot Springs, Salt Lake County
The geothermal heating system for the Utah State Prison came back on-line in January 2004, after being shut down for nearly 20 years, mainly due to calcite scaling. Johnson Controls, Inc., an energy-service company, entered into a long-term agreement with the Utah Department of Corrections to provide heat to the minimum-security wing of the prison. Johnson re-engineered and rebuilt the heating system to eliminate the past scaling problems, and provide space and water heating to the complex. Johnson completed additions to the prison project in 2005, and the geothermal heating system currently supplies heat and domestic hot water for 30,906 m2 (332,665 ft2) of the prison (including five large buildings housing 1460 inmate beds).
The spent geothermal fluid is cooled and cascaded to an aquaculture facility (tropical fish rearing) located about 0.8 km (0.5 mi) to the west and operated by Hi-Tech Fisheries.
For more information on these springs, see greenhouses and aquaculture.
Explore More
Utah Geothermal Network
The Utah Geothermal Network (UGeN) is a collaborative community built to connect people, projects, and ideas across Utah’s growing geothermal landscape. Our mission is to create a welcoming, non-competitive space for knowledge exchange that advances research, education, and real-world opportunities in geothermal energy.
FORGE Project
Utah FORGE Project
In 2014, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) initiated a program known as FORGE (Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy) for characterizing, creating, and sustaining an Enhanced Geothermal System reservoir. Five sites were initially considered. The DOE concluded the ideal site for a FORGE laboratory would be in low-permeability crystalline rock having temperatures between 175° and 225°C at depths between 1.5 and 4 km. Additional criteria included water availability, minimal environmental issues, easy access, and low potential of seismic hazards.
In 2018 the DOE selected the site near Milford, Utah, for the field laboratory. Led by the Energy & Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah, the considerable, diverse research that was carried out during the previous two years to characterize the site is summarized in 14 papers (accessible below). Supporting data from the research can be accessed through the Geothermal Data Repository maintained by DOE.
More information and news about the site is available at the project website
Publications:
Geothermal Characteristics of the Roosevelt Hot Springs System and Adjacent FORGE EGS Site, Milford, Utah
Edited by Rick Allis and Joseph N. Moore
Chapters
Revised Mapping of Bedrock Geology Adjoining the Utah FORGE Site
by Stefan M. Kirby
PDF Publication
Supplementary Data
Quaternary Geology of the Utah FORGE Site and Vicinity, Millard and Beaver Counties, Utah
by Tyler Knudsen, Emily Kleber, Adam Hiscock, and Stefan M. Kirby
Joint Patterns in the Mineral Mountains Intrusive Complex and their Roles in Subsequent Deformation and Magmatism
by John M. Bartley
PDF Publication
Supplementary Data
Thermal Characteristics of the Roosevelt Hot Springs System, with Focus on the FORGE EGS Site, Milford, Utah
by Rick Allis, Mark Gwynn, Christian Hardwick, Will Hurlbut, Stefan M. Kirby, and Joseph N. Moore
Groundwater Hydrogeology and Geochemistry of the Utah FORGE Site and Vicinity
by Stefan M. Kirby, Stuart Simmons, Paul C. Inkenbrandt, and Stan Smith
PDF Publication
Supplementary Data
Geophysical Surveys of The Milford, Utah, FORGE Site: Gravity and Tem
by Christian Hardwick, Will Hurlbut, and Mark Gwynn
Micro-Seismic Characterization of the Utah FORGE Site
by Kristine L. Pankow, Stephen Potter, Hao Zhang, Andy J. Trow, and Amy S. Record
Interpretation of Seismic Reflection Surveys Near the FORGE Enhanced Geothermal Systems Site, Utah
by John Miller, Rick Allis, and Christian Hardwick
Carbon Dioxide Flux and Carbon and Helium Isotopic Composition of Soil Gases Across the FORGE Site and Opal Mound Fault, Utah
by Kristen Rahilly, Stuart Simmons, and Tobias P. Fischer
PDF Publication
Supplementary Data
Localized Ambient Noise Tomography Over the FORGE Utah Site
by Andy J. Trow, Kristine L. Pankow, Yadong Wang, and Fan-Chi Lin
Petrography of the Utah FORGE Site and Environs, Beaver County, Utah
by Clay G. Jones, Joseph N. Moore, and Stuart Simmons
Compilation of Rock Properties from FORGE Well 58-32, Milford, Utah
by Mark Gwynn, Rick Allis, Christian Hardwick, Clay Jones, Peter Nielsen, and Will Hurlbut
Wireline Log and Borehole Image Interpretation for FORGE Well 58-32, Beaver County, Utah, and Integration with Core Data
by David A. Handwerger and John D. Mclennan
PDF Publication
Supplementary Data
Natural Fracture Characterization at the Utah FORGE EGS Test Site: Discrete Natural Fracture Network, Stress Field, and Critical Stress Analysis
by Bryan Forbes, Joseph N. Moore, Aleta Finnila, Robert Podgorney, Siavash Nadimi, and John D. Mclennan
Bibliography of Geothermal Characteristics of the Roosevelt Hot Springs System and Adjacent FORGE EGS Site, Milford, Utah
by Rick Allis
Public Interest Articles
Public Interest Articles
Geothermal Resources Articles: 18
Highlighted Reports
Highlighted Scientific Reports
Geothermal Characteristics of the Roosevelt Hot Springs System and Adjacent FORGE EGS Site, Milford, Utah
2019, Miscellaneous Publication 169
View publication
Geology of the Sulphurdale geothermal resources area, Beaver and Millard Counties, Utah
2013, Open-File Report 609
View publication
Subsidence in sedimentary basins due to groundwater withdrawal for geothermal energy development
2012, Open-File Report 601
View publication
Temperature-depth monitoring in the Newcastle geothermal system
2007, Report of Investigation 258
View publication
Newcastle, Utah small-scale geothermal power development project – exploratory drilling
2004, Report of Investigation 252
View publication
Geothermal resources of Utah, 2004
2004, Open-File Report 431DM
View publication
Working Group (2004-2009)
Utah Geothermal Working Group (UGWG)
Inactive since 2009
The Utah Geothermal Working Group (UGWG) is an organization comprised of representatives from federal, state, and local governments; utilities; renewable energy advocates; geothermal industry; environmental organizations; landowners; and other entities interested in development of geothermal energy in Utah.
The UGWG’s mission is to promote innovative development and effective utilization of Utah’s geothermal resources for direct use, power generation, and cascading uses. The primary emphasis is promotion of direct-use applications and small-scale geothermal power projects to stimulate rural economic development.
Position Paper, April 2005
Geothermal Energy Development in Utah
Geothermal Heat Pump, 2009
April 29 – 30, 2009
The 2009 Geothermal Heat Pump (GHP) Workshop was held at the Salt Lake City Library in downtown Salt Lake City on April 29, and April 30, 2009.
This workshop included presentations and discussions on GHP case histories, new drilling techniques, available products and services, water quality, and policy.
This workshop was designed for interested parties and utility staff who wanted to learn about geothermal heat pumps and to compare them with other resource options, or to learn how to improve existing programs.
The workshop was sponsored by the Utah State Energy Program, American Public Power Association (APPA), the Energy and Geoscience Institute, the Great Basin Center for Geothermal Technology, the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA), the SMU Geothermal Laboratory, SoundGT, the US DOE’s Geothermal Technologies Program, and Western Area Power Administration (WAPA).
PDF Presentations
SW Utah’s Geothermal Potential, 2008
April 22 – 23, 2008
This workshop focused on southwestern Utah’s geothermal potential for electricity, direct-use, and ground-source heat pumps and was held at Southern Utah University, Cedar City, Utah on April 22-23, 2008.
This meeting was designed for utilities, municipalities, students, and homeowners – however all interested parties were encouraged to attend.
The highly qualified speakers on the agenda bring a mix of professional experience in all aspects of geothermal energy.
The workshop was hosted by the Utah Geological Survey’s State Energy Program (SEP), Southern Utah University’s Department of Physical Sciences, and the U.S. Department of Energy’s Geopowering the West.
PDF Presentations
| Geothermal Resources in the Eastern Great Basin of Utah | Robert Blackett, Utah Geological Survey |
| Developing Geothermal Resources in Utah and the Western Markets | Daniel Fleishmann, Ormat Technologies, Inc. |
| Utah Renewable Energy Incentives | Jason Berry, Utah Geological Survey |
| ENEL North America Geothermal Projects in the Western U.S. |
John Snow, ENEL North America |
| Raser Technologies, Inc. | Mike Hayter, Raser Technologies |
| GeoExchange: Application for Low Temperature Geothermal | Cary Smith, Sound Geothermal |
| Blundell Geothermal Power Plant | Garth Larsen, PacifiCorp |
Electricity Generation, 2007
March 14 and 15, 2007
This meeting of the Utah Geothermal Working Group was held at the Utah State Library & Blind Center, Multi-Purpose Room, 1950 West 250 North, Salt Lake City, Utah.
The focus of the meeting was geothermal electricity generation.
PowerPoint Presentations
| Geothermal Development in Utah – 2006 | Robert Blackett, Utah Geological Survey |
| Utah Legislative Update | Phil Powlick, Utah Geological Survey, State Energy Program |
| New Federal Rules for Geothermal Leasing and Permitting | Kermit Witherbee & Al Mckee, Bureau of Land Management |
| The Role of Geothermal in Enhancing Energy Diversity and Security in the Western US | Roger Hill, Sandia National Laboratory |
| Blundell Geothermal Plant Expansion | Rene Andrews, Blundell Plant, PacifiCorp |
Direct Use & Heat Pumps, 2006
March 22 and 23, 2006
Schedule (pdf)
The Utah Geothermal Working Group sponsored a two-day workshop on ground-source heat pump (GHP) applications and direct-use of geothermal resources at the Quality Inn Airport, Salt Lake City, Utah on March 22-23, 2006.
The first day was devoted to ground-source heat pumps and included talks on utilization history, current installations, case studies, and operational experience in the western United States. The second day was devoted to direct-use application of geothermal resources and included talks on the nature of the resource, geothermal well completion, economics of direct-use projects, and case studies of various direct-use applications in the western United States. Afternoon field trips to GHP and geothermal direct-use sites followed each of the morning technical sessions.
This workshop was co-sponsored by the Utah Geothermal Working Group, U.S. Department of Energy GeoPowering the West, Sound Geothermal, Oregon Institute of Technology Geo-Heat Center, Washington State University Energy Program, University of Utah Energy & Geoscience Institute, and the Utah Geological Survey State Energy Program.
PowerPoint Presentations
| Introduction | |
|---|---|
| Ground-Source Heat Pumps and Geothermal Direct Use | Robert Blackett, Utah Geological Survey |
| Geothermal Heat Pumps | |
| Commercial Geothermal Heat Pumps, Operation and Maintenance – How Reliable Are They? | Gordon Bloomquist, Washington State University Energy Program |
| Energy FinAnswer & FinAnswer Express Programs | Trig Soleim, Utah Power |
| Geothermal Retrofit of HVAC Systems | Andrew Chiasson, Geo-Heat Center, Oregon Institute of Technology |
| Geothermal Heat Pump, Case Study I | Andrew Chiasson, Geo-Heat Center, Oregon Institute of Technology |
| Geothermal Heat Pump Systems: Closed-Loop Design Considerations | Andrew Chiasson, Geo-Heat Center, Oregon Institute of Technology |
| Jordan School District | Duane Devey |
| Ground Source Heat Pumps | Cary Smith, Sound Geothermal |
| Direct-Use Applications | |
| Nature and Occurrence of Geothermal Resources | Joe Moore, Energy and Geoscience Institute |
| Direct-Heat Geothermal Systems:steps to improve understanding about the source of heat | Rick Allis, Utah Geological Survey |
| Section 9006, Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Program | Richard Carrig, USDA-Rural Development |
| Geothermal Template for USDA Farm Bill Section 9006 – Applied to a Dairy Farm | Andrew Chiasson, Geo-Heat Center, Oregon Institute of Technology |
| Geothermal Resources in Utah, An Overview and Description of Uses in Utah | Robert Blackett, Utah Geological Survey |
| Geothermal Business Incubator | James C. Witcher, Witcher and Associates |
| Greenhouse and Aquaculture Applications of Geothermal Energy | Tonya Boyd, Geo-Heat Center, Oregon Institute of Technology |
| Greenhouse and Aquaculture Design Considerations | John W. Lund, Geo-Heat Center, Oregon Institute of Technology |
| Industrial Applications | John W. Lund, Geo-Heat Center, Oregon Institute of Technology |
| Geothermal Drilling | James C. Witcher, Witcher and Associates |
| Direct Heat Utilization of Geothermal Energy | John W. Lund, Geo-Heat Center, Oregon Institute of Technology |
| Geothermal District Energy | Gordon Bloomquist, Washington State University Energy Program |
| Evaluating the Feasibility of Geothermal Direct Use Projects | Gordon Bloomquist, Washington State University Energy Program |
| Websites and Sources of Geothermal Information | Tonya Boyd, Geo-Heat Center, Oregon Institute of Technology |
Meeting, 2005
October 12, 2005
PowerPoint Presentations
| Geothermal Power Generation Workshop | Robert Blackett, Utah Geological Survey |
| Amp Resources, Aquatrack and Kalina Cycle Technologies | Lyle Ball and Paul Stephan, Amp Resources |
| Raft River Geothermal Project | Doug Glaspey, US Geothermal Inc. |
| Geo-Heat Center: History, Scope of Services and Activities | John Lund, Geo-Heat Center, Oregon Institute of Technology |
| The United States of America Country Update | Gordon Bloomquist, Washington State University Energy Program |
Geothermal Power Generation, 2005
August 17th, 2005
The Department of Energy’s GeoPowering the West (GPW) program hosted a Geothermal Power Generation Workshop at the Department of Natural Resources on August 17th, 2005.
The workshop focused on the key benefits and risks of including geothermal power in a utility’s resources portfolio. This meeting was designed for utility resource personnel, however all interested parties were encouraged to attend. The highly qualified speakers on the agenda brought a mix of professional experience in all aspects of geothermal energy.
The workshop was sponsored by the following organizations: American Public Power Association, Geothermal Resources Council, Geothermal Energy Association, Geothermal Education Office, Utah Geothermal Working Group, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Sandia National Laboratory and Western Area Power Administration.
Guy Nelson, UEF (chair), Leon Pexton, UMPA, Garth Larsen, PacifiCorp and Bob Putnam, CH2M-Hill
PowerPoint Presentations
| Welcome | |
|---|---|
| US DOE, Geothermal Technologies Program Overview | Sandy Glatt, US Department of Energy |
| Geothermal Energy | Patrick Laney, Idaho National Laboratory |
| Utah Geothermal Developments 2005 | Robert Blackett, Utah Geological Survey |
| Panel I: Geothermal Energy Portolio from a Utility Perspective | |
| The Pleasures and Pains of Owning and Operating a Geothermal Plant |
Garth Larsen, PacifiCorp |
| Results of Geothermal Power Survey of Electric G&T Cooperatives | Robert Putnam, CH2M Hill Bob Gibson, NRECA Steve Lindenberg, Lindenberg Consulting |
| Geothermal Energy Portfolio | Leon Pexton, Utah Municipal Power Agency |
| Presentations | |
| Getting a Geothermal Project Online and to the Market | Daniel Schochet, ORMAT Nevada, Inc. |
| The Role of Geothermal in Enhancing Energy Diversity and Security in the Western US | Roger Hill, Sandia Labs, GeoPowering the West |
| Panel II: Power Purchase Agreements | |
| Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems | Douglas Hunter, Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems |
| PacifiCorp Informational Update | Ernie Wessman, PacifiCorp |
| Panel III: Project Development and Management Expertise | |
| Cost and Supply of Geothermal Power | Susan Petty, Black Mountain Technology |
| Amp Resources | Bruce Levy, Amp Resources |
| Panel IV: Permitting, Regulatory, and Environmental Issues | |
| Geothermal – Utah | Robert Henricks, BLM |
| Regulatory Issues | Becky Wilson, Utah Public Service Commission |
Meeting, 2005
February 24, 2005
Minutes (pdf)
The fourth meeting of the Utah Geothermal Working Group was held February 24, 2005 at the Utah Department of Natural Resources, 1594 W. North Temple in Salt Lake City, Utah.
The objectives of this group were to (1) inform and educate members about geothermal resources and development in Utah, and (2) help remove barriers to geothermal development by creating a set of action items to focus the working group.
PowerPoint Presentations
| Crystal Hot Springs | Jon Allred, Utah Energy Office |
| Utah Geothermal Marketing Group Meeting | Gordon Bloomquist, Washington State University Energy Program |
| Renewable Energy and Power, GeoPowering the West |
Patrick Laney, Idaho National Laboratory |
Exploring Utah Geothermal Opportunities, 2004
January 20, 2004
Agenda (pdf)
The Utah Geothermal Working Group, the National Geothermal Collaborative, and the Geothermal Resources Council sponsored a one day event, Exploring Utah Geothermal Opportunities on January 20, 2004 at the Marriott downtown at 75 South West Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah.
The purpose of the event was to engage the target audience in an information exchange/dialogue with some of the leading experts in the country, and individuals from Utah with hands-on geothermal experience to explore issues and opportunities pertaining to geothermal development in Utah.
PowerPoint Presentations
| Events Influencing Geothermal Development in Utah | |
|---|---|
| Geothermal Resource Development in Utah | Robert Blackett, Utah Geological Survey |
| Geothermal Lease Sale | Bob Henricks, BLM |
| Geopowering the West | Robert Neilson, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory |
| National Geothermal Collaborative | Kathleen Rutherford, Resolve, Inc. |
| Opportunities and Business Applications | |
| Greenhouse, Aquaculture and Industrial Applications of Geothermal Energy | Toni Boyd and John Lund, Geo-Heat Center, Oregon Institute of Technology |
| AmeriCulture, Tilapia Aquaculture in the Desert | James Witcher, Southwest Technology Development Institute, New Mexico State University |
| Geothermal Economic Impact | James Witcher |
| Relevant Regulations | |
| National Geothermal Policy and Regulation | Gordon Bloomquist, Washington State University Energy Program |
| US Geothermal Policy, Providing Incentives For and Reducing the Risk of Development | Gordon Bloomquist |
| US Geothermal Policy, Geothermal Steam Act Revision Under Consideration | Gordon Bloomquist |
| Utah Geothermal | Gordon Bloomquist |
| How to Finance Development | |
| Exploring Utah Geothermal Opportunities | Liz Battocletti, Bob Lawrence and Associates |
| Geothermal project funding opportunities through USDA-Rural Development | Richard Carrig, Rural Business Programs Director, USDA, Utah |
| What Issues are Developers Faced with that the State Can Influence? | |
| Utah Geothermal | Bob Henricks, BLM |
| A View from the Field, The Developer’s Approach to Geothermal Projects | Daniel Schochet, ORMAT Nevada, Inc. |
| Potential Policy Options to Advance Geothermal Development | |
| USDA-Rural Development Farm Bill Funding | Richard Carrig, Rural Business Programs Director, USDA, Utah |
| Geothermal Progress – The Energy Bill and the DOE Geothermal Technologies Program | Robert Neilson, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory |











