MAPS & PUBLICATIONS

Lidar Elevation Data

Comparison of 2006 National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) 1-meter color orthophoto imagery (left) and 2006 2-meter airborne lidar imagery (right) in the Snowbasin area, Weber County, Utah. Red lines outline the Green Pond and Bear Wallow landslides that are clearly visible in the lidar imagery, but barely visible to undetectable in the NAIP imagery.

Light detection and ranging (lidar) is a technique of transmitting laser pulses and measuring the reflected returns to measure the distance to an object or surface. Lidar is commonly used to determine ground surface elevations to create highly accurate, bare-earth digital elevation models (DEM).

As a lidar instrument can send pulses at a rapid rate, a high point-spacing density (e.g., several returns per square meter) is possible, much greater than would be possible by traditional surveying methods. Landslides, fault scarps, and other features that are difficult to detect visually because of vegetation, access, or other issues, may often be clearly shown in lidar data.

The UGS acquires lidar data with its partners in support of various geologic mapping and research projects. In 2011, approximately 1902 square miles (4927 km2) of 1-meter lidar data were acquired for the Cedar and Parowan Valleys, Great Salt Lake shoreline/wetland areas, Hurricane fault zone, Lowry Water, Ogden Valley, and North Ogden, Utah.

In 2013-2014, approximately 1422 square miles (3683 km2) of 0.5-meter lidar data were acquired for the entire Wasatch fault zone from north of Malad City, Idaho, south to near Fayette, Utah, West Valley fault zone, and most of Salt Lake and Utah Valleys in Utah.

The datasets include raw LAS (industry standard lidar format), LAS, DEM, digital surface model (DSM), and metadata (XML metadata, project tile indexes, and area completion reports) files.

Survey Notes 47-1

Three views of the historically active City Creek landslides that lie between Capitol Boulevard and the City Creek Canyon floor. (A) In the 1990s aerial photograph, the landslides are obscured by brush on the canyon wall, whereas in the newer (B) 0.5-meter 2013–14 lidar slope shade map the landslides and their geomorphology are clearly visible. (C) The remapped landslides are shown in red on the 2009 aerial photograph.

Comparison of mapping done with lidar (black lines) and without lidar (yellow lines). Airborne data for mapping the Wasatch fault zone at the mouth of Little Cottonwood Canyon, Utah.

Comparison of mapping done with lidar (black lines) and without lidar (yellow lines). Airborne data for mapping the Wasatch fault zone at the mouth of Little Cottonwood Canyon, Utah.

Available UGS Lidar Data

These lidar data are available from the AGRC Raster Data Discovery Application and by FTP (DEM data and metadata only), are included in the U.S. Geological Survey National Elevation Dataset that is part of The National Map (DEM data and metadata only), and OpenTopography (all data and metadata), a National Science Foundation-supported portal to high-resolution topography data and tools.

Lidar data are not directly viewable without suitable software, such as Global Mapper3DEM, or ESRI ArcGIS. Data from OpenTopography may be processed online to KMZ files using user-selected parameters (such as hillshade altitude and azimuth that may be viewed in Google Earth), which is generally the easiest way to access the data for most users.


Datasets acquired by the UGS and its partners are in the public domain and can be freely distributed with proper credit to the UGS and its partners.

Approximately 1,902 square miles of LiDAR data was acquired for the Cedar and Parowan Valleys, Great Salt Lake shoreline/wetland areas, Hurricane fault zone, Lowry Water area, Ogden Valley, and North Ogden, and 1,422 square miles of for the entire Wasatch fault zone from north of Malad City, Idaho, south to near Fayette, Utah, and most of Salt Lake and Utah Valleys.

Areas of lidar data acquired in 2011 are highlighted in red, acquisitions from 2013-2014 are in yellow. Blue indicates areas that have additional data available.

2011 Acquisition

The 2011 datasets were funded by the UGS, with the exception of the Great Salt Lake area, which was funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and UGS, and the North Ogden area, which was funded by the Utah Division of Emergency Management (UDEM), Floodplain Management Program.

The 2011 acquisition was performed by Utah State University, LASSI Service Center.

2011 Acquisition Area
mi2
Extent/Tile Index (pdf) Report (pdf) Metadata (zip)
Cedar and Parowan Valleys 498
yoloswag
yoloswag
 zip
Great Salt Lake Shoreline/Wetlands
(Bear River, Middle, North, South, and Tooele areas)
1147
yoloswag
yoloswag
 zip
Hurricane Fault Zone 36
yoloswag
yoloswag
 zip
Lowry Water 59
yoloswag
yoloswag
 zip
North Ogden 103
yoloswag
yoloswag
 zip
Ogden Valley 59
yoloswag
yoloswag
 zip

2013-2014 Acquisition

The 2013-2014 datasets were funded by the U.S. Geological Survey, Salt Lake County and various local cities, UDEM, and the UGS.

The 2013-2014 acquisition was performed by Quantum Spatial (formerly Watershed Sciences) through partnerships developed by the UGS and the Utah Automated Geographic Reference Center (AGRC).

2013-2014 ACQUISITION AREA
MI2
EXTENT/GIS (ZIP) REPORT (PDF) METADATA (ZIP)
Wasatch and West Valley Fault Zones,
Salt Lake and Utah Valleys
1422
 zip
yoloswag
 zip

2015 Acquisition

2015 ACQUISITION AREA
MI2
EXTENT/GIS (ZIP) REPORT (PDF) METADATA (ZIP)
Colorado and Green River Corridors 152
 zip
 zip

2016 Acquisition

2016 ACQUISITION AREA
MI2
EXTENT/GIS (ZIP) REPORT (PDF) METADATA (ZIP)
Bear Lake 123.2
 zip
yoloswag
Bear River 110.5
 zip
 zip
Cache Valley 380.7
 zip
 zip
East Ogden Valley 80.3
 zip
 zip
FORGE Milford 205
 zip
yoloswag
 zip
Great Salt Lake QL1 593.4
 zip
yoloswag
 zip
Great Salt Lake QL2 829.0
Minidoka Refuge 70.3
 zip
yoloswag
 zip
Thomas Fork Unit 10.8
 zip
 zip
Utah Lake 68.7
 zip
yoloswag
Washington County 516
 zip
yoloswag
 zip

2017 Acquisition

2017 ACQUISITION AREA
MI2
EXTENT/GIS (ZIP) REPORT (PDF) METADATA (ZIP)
Washakie and Whites Valley 26.2
 zip
yoloswag
 zip
Additional Resources

Survey Notes, Sept. 2017

The Wasatch Fault from Above: Re-mapping the Wasatch Fault Zone Using Airborne High-Resolution Topographic Data