|
The
Geology of Cedar Valley, Iron County, Utah, and Its Relation to
Ground-water Conditions
by Hugh A. Hurlow
ABSTRACT
Cedar Valley is a north-northeast-trending topographic depression
on the southeastern margin of the Basin and Range Province in Iron
County, southwestern Utah. The towns of Cedar City and Enoch, and
adjacent parts of the valley, experienced a 105 percent population
increase and a 110 percent increase in public-supply water use between
1980 and 2000, creating potential water-supply and water-quality
problems.
This report addresses the geology of the Cedar Valley drainage
basin and its influence on the storage and transport of ground water;
it represents part of a cooperative, multidisciplinary study of
the hydrogeology of Cedar Valley by the Utah Geological Survey and
the U.S. Geological Survey, designed to help local officials address
future watersupply issues.
The principal aquifer in the Cedar Valley drainage basin consists
of Tertiary sedimentary basin-fill deposits, chiefly interbedded
sand, gravel, silt, and clay. Most recharge is derived from infiltration
of Coal Creek into alluvial-fan deposits near Cedar City. Coal Creek
drains much of the Markagunt Plateau east of Cedar Valley; this
highland receives the majority of the precipitation that falls in
the drainage basin. The drainage basin is closed to surface outflow
except during extreme precipitation events, but minor underflow
of ground water occurs in places along its northwestern and southern
margins.
Miocene- to Holocene-age normal faults bound the eastern and western
margins of the Cedar Valley depositional basin. The eastern basin-bounding
fault system (EBBFS) is physically more continuous and accommodated
significantly greater displacement than faults along the western
basin margin. Subsidence of the EBBFS hanging wall created the Cedar
Valley depositional basin, which accumulated up to 3,800 feet (1,160
m) of basin-fill sediment. This sediment was derived chiefly from
the uplifting footwall, and was deposited in alluvial-fan environments
along the basin margins and in fluvial and lacustrine environments
in the basin interior.
Interpretation of seismic-reflection data collected by Mobil Exploration
and Production Services U.S., Inc. reveals that the Tertiary basin
fill contains three unconformity- bounded units and has a complicated
subsurface structure that is not entirely reflected by present-day
topography. These relations indicate a complex evolution of coupled
faulting and basin subsidence during Tertiary time.
The transmissivity of the basin-fill aquifer, estimated from aquifer-test
and specific-capacity test data, is greatest in coarse-grained alluvial-fan
deposits along the eastern and southwestern basin margins, and gradually
decreases toward the basin center as sedimentary deposits become
progressively finer grained.
Bedrock units are presently of secondary importance for water supply,
but they are hydrologically connected to the basin-fill aquifer
and include several hightransmissivity units that are important
aquifers in other parts of southwestern Utah.
INTRODUCTION
This report describes aspects of the geology of Cedar Valley and
adjacent areas, located in Iron County, southwestern Utah, that
most directly influence the occurrence and flow of ground water.
The report focuses primarily on unconsolidated to semi-consolidated
basin-fill sediments of Quaternary-Tertiary age beneath Cedar Valley
because they are presently the most important aquifer for the valley,
and secondarily on bedrock units because they are hydrologically
connected to the basin fill and are the target of increasing ground-water
development.
A digitally compiled geologic map (plate 1) and accompanying cross
sections (plate 2) illustrate the geology of the region. The cross
sections and related isopach maps show the large-scale geometry
and stratigraphy of the basin fill, and are based primarily on interpretations
of 11 seismic-reflection lines obtained from Mobil Exploration and
Production Services U.S., Inc. (now part of ExxonMobil).
The work summarized herein is part of a cooperative, multidisciplinary
project by the Utah Geological Survey and the Water Resources Division
of the U.S. Geological Survey to characterize the budget, flow,
and chemistry of ground water in the Cedar Valley drainage basin.
The goal of the project is to provide tools to help local and
state officials manage ground-water development to sustain reserves
and maintain high chemical quality. Such tools are necessary because
the population of the study area increased by about 105 percent
and water use from public suppliers increased by about 110 percent
between 1980 and 2000, and groundwater levels have gradually declined
in most of the valley since 1945 (Utah Division of Water Rights,
1982, 2000; Burden, 2000; Utah Governors Office of Planning
and Budget, 2001a).
The principal conclusions of this project are as follows. Unconsolidated
Quaternary-Tertiary-age sediment in the Cedar Valley depositional
basin forms two distinct subbasins in the northeastern and southwestern
parts of the valley. Both sub-basins comprise asymmetric, east-thickening
wedges that terminate against the eastern basin-bounding fault system
(EBBFS), a Quaternary-Tertiary-age normalfault zone responsible
for basin formation.
The basin-fill sediment grades from coarse alluvial-fan deposits
near the basin margins to finer grained alluvial and playa deposits
in the basin center. This facies variation largely controls the
distribution of transmissivity within the basin-fill aquifer, with
values ranging from over 20,000 square feet per day (>1,860 m2/d)
along the basin margins to less than 5,000 square feet per day (<465
m2/d) in the basin center.
The best prospective bedrock aquifers in the area include fractured
volcanic rocks below and adjacent to the southwestern basin margin,
and fractured sedimentary rocks southeast of the basin.
To assist non-geologists in reading this report, many technical
or specialized geologic terms are defined in a glossary located
after the references. Geologic ages are reported with the abbreviations
ka for thousands of years before present and Ma for millions of
years before present. For example, the phrase the Pleistocene
epoch lasted from 1.6 Ma to 10 ka means that the Pleistocene
epoch began 1.6 million years before present and ended 10,000 years
before present.
|